High Technology and Human Development
Some normal premises – mostly normal via leaders and supported by means of the led – endeavor the collective conscience of the led in so far as they stimulate a willed progress. The development is quite often superior however now not necessarily civilized. The premises in question are of this type: “Our degree of technological development is 2nd to none. Upon accomplishing this degree, we additionally have to prepare our society for peace, and to guarantee the peace, technology have got to be revised to foster the policy of conflict.” Technological advancement that’s pushed on this path sets a detrimental precedent for other societies that worry a threat to their respective sovereignties. They are pushed to additionally foster a struggle technological know-how.
Within the area of civilization, this mode of progress is not praiseworthy, neither is it morally justifiable. Due to the fact it’s not morally justifiable, it’s socially irresponsible. An inspection of the premises will divulge that it is the last one that poses a obstacle. The final premise is the conclusion of two previous premises but is not in any respect logically deduced. What it shows is a passionately deduced conclusion, and being so, it fails to be reckoned as a conclusion from a rationally ready mind, as a minimum at the time at which it was once deduced.
A society that advances consistent with the above presuppositions – and exceptionally consistent with the illogical conclusion – has transmitted the psyche of non-negotiable superiority to its men and women. All alongside, the vigour of passion dictates the % of human conduct. Whether in positive engagements or willed partnerships, the principle of equality fails to work precisely because of the prevalence syndrome that grips the leader and the led. And yet another society that refuses to share in the collective sensibilities or ardour of such society has, with the aid of the expected good judgment, turn out to be a advantage or genuine enemy and faces disagreement on all possible fronts.
Most of what we be trained in regards to the reward world, of path, by way of the media, is dominated by means of modern-day technology. Societies that have the most of such technological know-how are also, time and again, claimed to be probably the most advanced. It isn’t most effective their development that lifts them to the top of power, superiority, and reputation. They are able to also use science to simplify and move ahead an working out of life and nature in an additional path, a path that tends to get rid of, as much as viable, a previous connection between lifestyles and nature that used to be, in lots of respects, mystical and dangerous. This last point does no longer always imply that technological advancement is a mark of a advanced civilization.
What we ought to comprehend is that civilization and science are usually not conjugal phrases. Civilized people could have an advanced science or they won’t have it. Civilization isn’t just a subject of science and technology or technical infrastructure, or, once more, the marvel of structures; it additionally has to do with the moral and intellectual reflexes of folks as well as their level of social connectedness within their possess society and beyond. It is from the general behaviour makeup of people that each one types of physical structures could be created, so too the question of science and technology. Thus, the form of bridges, roads, structures, heavy machinery, amongst others, that we are able to see in a society might inform, in a common approach, the behavioural pattern of the people. Behavioural sample might also tell lots in regards to the extent to which the ordinary atmosphere has been utilized for infrastructural hobbies, science and technology. Exceptionally, behavioural pattern would tell rather a lot in regards to the perceptions and understanding of the humans about other men and women.
I do consider – and, I believe, most humans do feel – that upon accelerating the fee of infrastructural movements and technological know-how, the environment has to recede in its naturalness. As soon as advancing science (and its attendant structures or ideas) competes with the golf green atmosphere for area, this environment that residences trees, grass, vegetation, all sorts of animals and fish has to lessen in measurement. Yet the development of populace, the relentless human craving for satisfactory lifestyles, the must control existence with out depending on the unpredictable of the average environment immediate the use of technological know-how. Technological know-how needn’t pose unwarranted threat to the traditional atmosphere. It is the misuse of technological know-how that is in question. At the same time a society could justly make use of science to make stronger first-rate of existence, its folks also need to ask: “how much technological know-how will we ought to safeguard the normal environment?” suppose society Y blends the moderate use of science with the traditional atmosphere to be able to offset the reckless destruction of the latter, then this variety of positioning prompts the point that society Y is a lover of the principle of stability. From this precept, you could boldly conclude that society Y favours stability greater than chaos, and has, therefore, the sense of ethical and social accountability. Any contemporary technology points to the sophistication of the human mind, and it shows that the average atmosphere has been cavalierly tamed.
If people do not need to are living at the mercy of the natural atmosphere – which, of course, is an unsure subculture – however in step with their own expected %, then the usage of science is a matter of course. It will look that the precept of stability that society Y has chosen could simplest be for a brief while or that this is extra of a make-feel position than an actual one. For when the vigor of the human intellect gratifies itself following a momentous fulfillment in science, retreat, or, at exceptional, a slow-down is really distinct. It’s as if the human mind is telling itself: “technological development has to accelerate without any obstruction. A retreat or a gradual approach is an insult to the inquiring mind.” This kind of notion system simplest aspects out the enigma of the mind, its dark facet, not its best subject. And in searching for to interrogate the reward mode of a certain technological know-how in step with the instructional materials of the mind, the function of ethics is indispensable.
Is it morally correct to make use of this type of technological know-how for this style of product? And is it morally correct to use this type of product? Each questions hint that the product or products in question are both hazardous or now not, environmentally pleasant or now not, or that they do not handiest rationale harm directly to people but immediately to the environment too. And if, as i have stated, the cause of technology is to toughen the satisfactory of existence, then to use technological know-how to provide products that harm each humans and the average environment contradicts the purpose of technology, and it also falsifies an declaration that humans are rational. Moreover, it means that the subtle level that the human mind has reached is unable to grasp the essence or intent of quality existence. On this regard, a peaceable coexistence with the common environment would had been abandoned for the sake of an unrestrained, inquiring human mind. The human intellect would, because it had been, end up corrupted with beliefs or ideas which can be untenable in any quantity of approaches.
The advocacy that is performed through environmentalists relate to the question of environmental degradation and its bad penalties on people. They insist that there is no justification for producing high-tech products that damage each people and the ordinary atmosphere. This rivalry sounds persuasive. Excessive technological know-how may display the height of human accomplishment, however it would possibly not point to moral and social accountability. And to this point, the query is also requested: “In what methods can humans shut the chasm between unrestrained excessive technological know-how and environmental degradation?”
Too more commonly, most modern humans are likely to feel that a worldly culture is optimal to a easy one. The previous is supported with the aid of the weight of excessive technology, the latter is more often than not not. The previous eases the burden of relying an excessive amount of on the dictates of the common environment, the latter does no longer. The latter tends to seek a symbiotic relationship with the ordinary atmosphere, the previous does now not. Whether or not human remedy must come mostly from an advanced science or the typical atmosphere isn’t a topic that would be readily answered. If the common atmosphere is shrinking due to populace progress and different unavoidable motives, then developed technology is required to alleviate the pressures to human relief that come up. It is the irresponsible proliferation of, say, war technological know-how, high-tech merchandise, among others, that are short of criticism and have got to discontinue.